. . . Friday January 20, 2006

Intelligent Debunk

This just in on the topic of intelligent design:

This isn’t how science is done. If the model proposed by Darwin is deemed insufficient, one should look for another, but it’s not correct from a methodological point of view to take oneself away from the scientific field pretending to do science.

[Intelligent design] doesn’t belong to science and the pretext that it be taught as a scientific theory alongside Darwin’s explanation is unjustified.

It only creates confusion between the scientific and philosophical and religious planes.

That was just a little something I read in the Vatican newspaper.


Concentration is important!